Descartes
...sure to discuss how this argument addresses the
paradox with which the passage starts. Is this argument really about wax?
Explain.
Descartes is trying to establish his mind more clearly through the wax. He does
not yet know what he is. He is still trying to find what "I" am he doesn't know. He
discusses the characteristics of the wax, its color, shape, smell, taste, feel, and how it
sounds. He also discusses how when he places it over fire all of these characteristics
change, yet the same wax exists. He understands the wax with his mind, and he uses his
senses to learn of its characteristics even though with the wax these characteristics
change. He understands this substance as wax; even as its characteristics change, he uses
his senses to get his information, but he uses his mind to process and understand this
information.
The paradox of the whole passage is the fact that even though he can know about
the physical world, we can understand it he can not be sure of its existence, yet he can
proof the existence of the mental world and yet he does not know much about it.
The argument is not really about wax at all, the wax is used as a tool to look back at
himself, he is introspecting, or looking in on his own self. Even though the argument
talks about the characteristics of the wax, he is only using that as a mirror into his own
mind. He was able to prove that his mind exists because he could understand the wax,
what it really was, not its characteristics. Wax takes many forms, if he wanted he could
bend and mold it into an infinite amount of shapes more than he could even imagine.
The wax is not its smell, it's not its feel, or its taste, or the sound it makes, the wax is
wax, a substance that he can not even be sure exists but can understand it and in so doing
can...
View Full Essay
